Dear readers,
I sent a letter similar to this one to Pope Francis and thought you might also send one like this to: Pope Francis, Casa s. Marta, 00120 Vatican City.
I therefore present to you a text that you can all freely download, there is also automatic translation in many languages, and send to the Pope. If thousands of letters like this reach the Pope, it will certainly be an extremely significant fact that will remain in the history of the Church and that will serve to testify how thousands of Catholics under the guidance of God and his Truth have felt the need to condemn certain papal actions and to warn the Pontiff about the Judgment of God and the probable divine Punishment that is being brought upon himself. We do not hate the Pope but we love Christ and in Christ we love and warn his Vicar for the good of the Church and his own.
I would like to point out that this letter is translated now into English with the help of a good neural automatic translation and with my revision, the official text however is in Italian and can be found on this same site at this link:
https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/lettera-a-papa-francesco/
Priest Tullio Rotondo, Doctor in Theology and in Law
If you want to download the letter directly in PDF, click on this link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cLjl_3Vaj2Fc_u8SRwP8_1gvxAp_h8pF/view?usp=sharing
NB THE LETTER MUST BE SIGNED
Attention!
When you click on the number of the notes of the letter you are directed to another page, when you are on that page to return to this page at the point where you are you must click the button you use to return to the previous page, i.e. the arrow at the top left.
Letter to Pope Francis
Pope Francis,
I am writing to you to point out that your attitude is now well known, and that, even through subtle means, you are perverting Catholic doctrine and causing scandal among the faithful.
St. Paul says that “a bishop, as the steward of God, must be above reproach: not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for gain, but hospitable, a lover of good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled, holding fast to the faithful word which he has been taught, so that he may be able both to exhort by sound doctrine and to refute those who oppose him.” (Titus 1)
The same Apostle says to Titus: “But you teach what is in accordance with sound doctrine.” (Titus 2)
The Bishop and especially the Pope must teach what is according to sound doctrine.
You and many of your collaborators are spreading colossal doctrinal perversions, unfortunately.
The book entitled “Betrayal of sound doctrine through Amoris Laetitia. How Pope Francis and some of his collaborators are spreading a morality contrary to the deposit of faith” documents all this extensively and cites many texts, various prelates, many theologians and many Catholic intellectuals who speak of this doctrinal perversion and the scandal that is being produced by it, they even go so far as to speak of real heresies spread by the current Pontiff, that is, by you.
This book is already available in 2 volumes and can be downloaded for free from this site https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
Just a few months ago it was highlighted by the same author how you have perverted the Catholic doctrine on the circumstances of the human act, opening the way to many other errors that you have spread, you can view the text at this link: https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/capitolo-viii-crollo-della-morale-cristiana-attraverso-la-dottrina-bergogliana-su-attenuanti-scusanti-e-bene-possibile/
At the beginning of this year, the same author published a document of about 70 pages in which he highlights how Confessions are being administered invalidly and sacrilegiously, due to the errors or heresies of you and your various collaborators, you can view it at this link https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/papa-francesco-ei-suoi-collaboratori-attraverso-errori-o-eresie-stanno-causando-linvalidita-di-molte-confessioni/ .
In this regard, it must also be underlined that you have amply trampled on the rules of sound doctrine regarding the reception of the Eucharist established to avoid scandal [1] , in fact you prevented the American Bishops from prohibiting the reception of Eucharistic Communion to the super abortionist Biden [2] , President of the United States, also a supporter of homosexual marriage; you yourself, Pope Francis, then evidently told the same American President that you are happy that he is a good Catholic and can take Communion; President Biden in fact stated: “We spoke with the Pope about the fact that he is happy that I am a good Catholic and that I continue to receive Communion” [3] .
In fact, the Holy See did not deny President Biden’s words.
Likewise , with papal permission, Eucharistic Communion was given in the Vatican to Nancy Pelosi [4], a well-known member of the American Democratic Party, who is notoriously in favor of abortion and other immoral practices.
These two characters receive the Eucharist without ever having converted from such notorious sins!
All this, besides being radically contrary to sound doctrine, is greatly scandalous and shameful!!
Furthermore, if a notorious super abortionist who supports homosexual marriage, like President Biden or Nancy Pelosi, is considered a good Catholic and can receive the Sacraments without converting, just as a notorious adulterer or a notorious transsexual can receive the Sacraments without converting from their sinful conduct, equally a transsexual or a notorious sinner can act as a godfather or godparent without proposing to change his life, this is what you are evidently opening the doors to discreetly but clearly and Cardinal McElroy made it clear and was not corrected, obviously, by anyone [5] .
All of this, I emphasize, is scandalous at the highest level and radically contrary to sound doctrine which opposes the reception of the Sacraments by notorious sinners. [6]
We have also noticed your false statements, contrary to sound doctrine, about the extenuating circumstances spread by Amoris Laetitia [7] … do you think that God and men do not see them and that all this does not create scandal?
Do you think that God and even men do not see the doctrinal perversions with which you consider the death penalty absolutely inadmissible [8] , the errors with which you distort the sound doctrine on moral conscience [9] and introduce a false discernment contrary to Catholic doctrine with various subterfuges [10] ?
It is scandalous, not to say blasphemous, to affirm, as you do in n. 303 of Amoris Laetitia, that discernment, through which one must find the will of God for some people especially in some situations, can establish that a person can continue to commit adultery and other acts against the negative commands of the divine Law.
God, especially after He spoke through the Church, radically opposes acts that seriously conflict with these negative commands; God does not want and does not ask for adultery or acts against the negative commands of the divine Law, the Bible is very clear on this point and with it the Tradition. [11]
Not God but Satan wants such acts [12] ; unfortunately, you are making yourselves spreaders of what Satan wants.
In this line it is understood that what you indicate with the term charity is not the charity that Scripture and sound Tradition speak of but a perversion of it which leads you to administer the Sacraments to clearly unworthy people with great scandal and leads you to do various other things which are precisely contrary to this virtue, as explained extensively in the books indicated above.
And what about the “heretical” blessings for homosexual couples that you are supporting ?
… you have succeeded in making the Catholic Church, the true Church of Christ, appear as a Church that goes against the Gospel, so much so that the Coptic Orthodox have stopped the ecumenical discussions with our theologians because of your “change of position” on blessings for homosexual couples; the Russian Orthodox have radically condemned such blessings! You are also scandalizing non-Catholics by your departure from the Gospel. [13]
… and many Catholic Episcopates have rightly denied their support for these perversions that you spread! [14] … and obviously their prelates have not been made Cardinals … but those who support homosexual activity and, we must think, also blessings for homosexual couples, like Fr. Radcliffe op [15] , have become Cardinals .
Equally scandalous is the support that the Pope, that is, you, offers to the “heresies” of Fr. J. Martin, to those of Sister Gramick and to the entire homosexual and transsexual movement as clearly shown in the second volume of the book cited [16] … do you think that God and men do not see them?
For 10 years, you, Pope Francis, have been operating with your actions, with discretion, a clear subversion of the Catholic doctrine on homosexuality … as clearly shown in the second volume of the book cited [17] ; “Fiducia supplicans” is only the latest of such acts.
Do you think that God hasn’t noticed it and that many in the Church haven’t noticed it?
In an important interview, Msgr. CM Viganò stated: “For Bergoglio and his entourage, sodomy is not a sin that cries out for vengeance in the sight of God, as the Catechism teaches. The Pope’s words on this subject – and even more so the actions and words of the people he surrounds himself with – unfortunately confirm that a work of legitimization is underway on homosexuality, and that those who are carrying this discourse forward are Prelates and theologians who have manifested without equivocation that they are not faithful to Catholic teaching.” [18]
Cardinal Muller clarified: “Every Catholic believes in the divine and Catholic truth that in Peter the bishops of Rome are installed as his legitimate successors. But as a theologically enlightened disciple of Christ, he opposes the caricature of the papacy both in the anti-Roman polemics of the reformers of the time and in the parrot-like understanding of non-Catholic neo-papalism or papagayism … “ [19]
Cardinal Sarah added that the “Fiducia supplicans” contains a real heresy which must be radically opposed, for the good of the Church [20] … obviously a heresy on the doctrine regarding homosexuality.
You are trying to legitimize homosexual activity, as amply shown in the books cited [21] , contrary to what the Bible and Tradition say…
What I am saying is confirmed by your latest appointments, in particular that of Prof. A. Fumagalli [22] as consultant to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and that of Fr. Radcliffe as Cardinal. In the books cited, they are spoken of extensively as authors of statements that you, Pope Francis, should have severely sanctioned, and instead promote these individuals…
In particular, Professor and priest A. Fumagalli continues to calmly write, preach and teach despite affirming the legitimacy of homosexual acts in his book “L’amore possibile. Persone omosessuali e morale cristiana.” Cittadella Editrice 2020 [23] ; the affirmations of this author are discussed at length in chapter 7 of the book which refutes your affirmations [24] and it is noted how the preface of Fumagalli’s text was written by a Bishop, the then Monsignor Semeraro, who then, obviously, you created Cardinal!
Fumagalli’s book was advertised in your newspaper, that is, the Bishops’, entitled “Avvenire”. [25]
You should have equally condemned and sanctioned the statements of Cardinals very close to you who say similar things, such as Cardinal Marx and Cardinal Hollerich.
Instead, these subjects are promoted by you or kept among your closest collaborators.
Evidently you support such doctrinal and moral perversions , in fact: whoever does not resist manifest error, even though he can and must do so, is considered a supporter of the same error: ” Qui errori manifesta non resistit, cùm possit et debeat, eum approbare censetur.” [26] I underline that this text is quoted by St. R. Bellarmine, I add that in the same text quoted we also read that he who does not oppose error approves it, he who does not defend the truth oppresses it. [27]
You, as Pope, must publicly correct and sanction these individuals who publicly affirm things that are clearly and gravely contrary to sound doctrine as well as scandalous; however, you not only do not correct and sanction them but you keep these individuals close to you or promote them!
You are evidently complicit and approve of such errors which are contrary to the infallible doctrine of the Church and therefore practically heretical!
This is an extremely serious matter.
And what about what the Pope, that is, you, did with the Pachamama?
I read: “After the well-known events that occurred during the Synod of the Amazon which saw the statue of the Inca goddess Pachamama used in pagan rites in the Vatican gardens, a procession inside St. Peter’s Basilica, and a vigil inside the church of Santa Maria in Traspontina, some intellectuals, priests, religious and deacons have raised a public protest and condemnation of the sacrilegious acts, requesting a public act of repentance from Pope Francis” [28] …
These are acts in the apostate line, these that the Pope, that is, you, have legitimized… a very serious and scandalous fact!!
A famous Italian journalist and Catholic wrote: “In the face of the scandal and the questions raised by the rites in the Vatican Gardens and in the Church of Santa Maria in Traspontina there have been evasive, contradictory and, worse, even denying responses: just yesterday the Prefect of the Congregation for Communication, Paolo Ruffini, insisted on the fact that there was no pagan rite in the Vatican Gardens and this despite the fact that the videos tell exactly the opposite to any person of common sense …” [29]
And what about the damage you do to vocations and future priests precisely with the doctrinal perversion and heresies that they are obviously forced to learn in the seminaries; who knows how many young people stay away from the seminaries so as not to be perverted by your errors and who knows how many scandals and probably also paedophilia will produce, in the future, your openings precisely on homosexuality and more generally on sexuality as well as the confusion and doctrinal perversion that you are causing.
Obviously in this subversion of doctrine you have opposed the good Bishops… you are contrasting and neutralizing them.
Archbishop Aguer said: “The Pope does not stop doing damage. His duplicity, Jesuitical and Argentinean, inspires him in the worst decisions. As in the case of Joseph Strickland, bishop of Tyler in Texas, Francis tries to neutralize the best of the successors of the Apostles by imposing a coadjutor on them or by sending an apostolic visit”. [30]
You have opposed those who reaffirmed sound doctrine, you have marginalized them … you have taken away the salary and health care of Cardinal Burke; while the infamous former Fr. Rupnik, despite being clearly accused by many women of abuse, continues to be a priest and to operate as such!
You will answer for all this to God!
About Rupnik the words of this woman, who declares herself a victim of Rupnik, are very clear and enlightening and appear to be completely true, watch the following videos:
As one victim of sexual predation by a priest explained: the delays and lack of transparency in abuse cases are “re-traumatizing.” [31]
With your inexplicable delay I fear that you are traumatizing or even scandalizing these people who clearly and clearly accuse Fr. Rupnik and you are scandalizing the entire world.
It is evident that this priest, a former Jesuit, is very protected by the Pope, that is, by You, since despite so many very clear accusations he remains in his position … and instead You attack Cardinal Burke, who reaffirms sound doctrine, attack Msgr. Melina, attack Msgr. Martinez or Msgr. Strickland etc. who reaffirm sound doctrine!
I cannot forget the suffering and the great difficulties that you are causing to the good and true Chinese Catholics with your attitude and with the agreement that you made with the Chinese authorities , with which you left it up to them to choose the Bishops as had already happened before the agreement [32] ; it is significant that you did not make it known but things are known anyway and in fact as an expert explains, things are in reality exactly like this [33] .
Of course, it is not to be thought that the Chinese authorities have given in, but you… [34]
As an Italian journalist who is very knowledgeable about the issue writes, Beijing is commanding you and unfortunately it commands within the Church, among souls. [35]
Various Chinese Catholic personalities said that the agreement should not be made, evidently they knew how things would end, more precisely they affirmed among other things: “… the agreement could create irreparable damage” and added: “… the agreement will not only fail to guarantee a limited freedom so desired by the Church, but will also damage the sanctity, the catholicity, the apostolicity of the Church, and will be an attack on the moral power of the Church. The Church could no longer have the possibility of enjoying the trust of the people, and be “like the leaven and almost the soul of human society, destined to be renewed in Christ and transformed into the family of God” (Gaudium et Spes, 40).” [36] .
As we will see in these pages, the words of these personalities appear prophetic, unfortunately, and the damages they speak of do not only come from the agreement!
As one expert said, your agreement with China: “… has weakened the Church of its prophetic role: it is visible that the Pope speaks openly against human rights violations in any direction, but not against China … “ [37]
Cardinal Zen has particularly highlighted the damage you are causing to the Church and to souls, he has unmasked your deplorable concessions in and to China [38]
Significant is the article that this cardinal posted on his blog, regarding the true facts according to which a Vatican prelate asked the bishops of Shantou and Mindong, underground and recognized by the Holy See, to withdraw to make room for two illicit and excommunicated bishops. [39]
Of special interest in this line is also that you have recognized seven Bishops evidently and gravely unworthy: “People – says Zen – who have none of the qualities required to be bishops, who have spent years challenging the Holy See. And now, without any repentance, without any thanks to the Holy Father, they have become legitimate. A year ago, from the Holy See, a document arrived – without any signature at the bottom – in which the so-called clandestine Catholics are encouraged to come out into the open and join the patriotic Church, which as everyone knows is subjected to a regime. The Holy See has in practice encouraged the faithful to join a schismatic church. And the Pope knows that it is schismatic, he told me so.” [40]
I underline: the Holy See has practically encouraged the faithful to join a schismatic church and the Pope knows that it is schismatic, he told me!
Very serious!
I also underline that the words of Cardinal Zen make it even better clear how China commands, thanks to you, the souls of Catholics in China with Bishops of the kind just mentioned: wolves who lead the flock.
The agreement, obviously, seems to go precisely along these lines.
Truly, you, Pope Francis, are spreading spiritual death and darkness, unfortunately, even in this area!
In this line it is not strange that you have never criticized communist China for its violations of human rights and that you have even given it publicity [41] … you have even said that you do not feel like describing China as anti-democratic [42] , when everyone knows that it is a terrible regime and what is more it is fundamentally anti-Christian that has persecuted and persecutes many Christians, it is a kind of hell on earth. [43]
Cardinal Zen stated that in China: “There is no religious freedom because there is no freedom. We, and I repeat, must not expect anything. In China they persecute the churches because there is no freedom for anyone. Unfortunately, both in Hong Kong and in Rome, they are trying to appease Beijing, thus appearing to be compliant. In recent years not a word of reproach has come from Rome regarding all the evils committed by China. The whole world sees how young people are beaten, all of them. In general silence”. [44] … especially silence from you, Pope Francis.
The sinicization that the government is asking for regarding the Church of China, as the Chinese cardinal explains: “They are lies … Sinicization means exclusively obeying the Communist Party. Do we realize that after the signing of the 2018 Agreement, the Patriotic Association and the so-called Chinese Episcopal Conference immediately declared that they would continue as before with obedience to the Party? It couldn’t be clearer… I repeat: that document regarding entry into the ‘official’ church, if applied to the letter, would also justify apostasy”. [45]
I underline: your document would also justify apostasy… above we saw that the acts relating to the Pachamama that you wanted or permitted have taken an apostatic turn… Dramatic!
An abysmal difference separates you from Pope Benedict XVI in his opposition to the terrible actions of communist China [46] and in his action for a dialogue in truth [47] . It could be said of you that you are, unfortunately, a kind of altar boy of communist China, as you have defined in a certain way the Russian Patriarch Cyril, an altar boy of Putin… and I underline unfortunately…
And what about the interventions of the Pope, that is, of you, in favor of experimental vaccines, which for about three years many governments have been trying to impose on people with fraudulent techniques and which you yourself have imposed in the Vatican? These are seriously erroneous interventions because the Covid vaccines are experimental and it is immoral to force people to receive them, as good bioethics teaches [48] , many serious indications clearly suggest that these vaccines are unsafe [49] and cause serious damage to health [50] .
Nobel Prize winner Montagnier stated precisely that these vaccines are unsafe [51] .
It appears gravely immoral that no tests have been done to see whether the widely distributed Covid vaccines can cause cancer in those who receive them [52] , while some experts have instead stated that these vaccines, which should rather be considered as gene therapy, are significantly correlated with particular and widespread cases of cancer [53] .
Among the various statements in a document by German-speaking professors against compulsory vaccination, I want to highlight those in which they state that: during the period of massive use of vaccines, there has been a significant increase in excess mortality, which has special links with vaccination: if the number of vaccinations increases, excess mortality also increases; if the number of vaccinations decreases, excess mortality also decreases. This pattern is found in various countries and could be an indication of dramatic side effects previously overlooked. [54]
The famous Professor McCullough, a great and courageous American scientist said at the time of the Covid epidemic: “The Vatican should abandon all vaccination mandates, lift all restrictions, and abandon all support or concern for vaccines. The Vatican should immediately launch a public interest campaign on vaccine harm and vaccine deaths. They should formally apologize for taking a deleterious position on vaccines and they will have to account for the potential hundreds of thousands of lives lost to vaccines around the world because the Vatican has violated what is called the Nuremberg Code – the Vatican has violated a critical point of the bioethics code and they must immediately acknowledge that. They must immediately apologize for this grave error that they have committed. The Nuremberg Code states that no one, under any conditions, shall apply any pressure, coercion or threat of retaliation for any medical treatment or procedure performed, and particularly when the procedure is new, is investigative, is experimental and the outcomes are unknown.” [55]
Even the Pope, that is, you, removed a Bishop, Msgr. Torres, whose fault was “that of not having supported, in the past two years, the Covid vaccination campaign”, the Bishop “defended the right to refuse vaccination on the basis of conscience and insisted on the fact that “it is possible for a faithful Catholic to raise a conscientious objection to the presumed obligatory nature of the Covid-19 vaccine”. [56]
Cardinal Muller rightly stated that: there was no justification for compulsory vaccination, and bishops had no right to speak of moral obligation. [57]
You, Pope Francis, are doing a lot of harm and you are not stopping… you are going ahead…!
I emphasize that the doctrinal perversion you are spreading is of a heretical level, as indicated by eminent, courageous theologians.
In November 2023, Cardinal Muller gave an interview [58] in which he stated that “some of Pope Francis’ statements are formulated in such a way that they can reasonably be understood as material heresy , regardless of their unclear subjective meaning”; in that interview he reiterated that a Pope who teaches formal heresy could theoretically lose his office, but added that such a case has not yet occurred in the history of the Church.
According to the German prelate, you have not committed formal heresy and, therefore, you have not lost your papal office.
Cardinal Müller also argued that “through Francis’s promotion and implicit toleration of ‘blessings’ for same-sex persons and of Holy Communion for the divorced and the ‘civilly remarried,’ the Pope is promoting a ‘heresy of praxis’; the cardinal then “stressed that desired ‘modern’ changes in the Church are always introduced by ‘pastoral means’ rather than through the teaching of a formal heresy.” [59]
Furthermore, referring to the words that, with his approval, in the “Response” to Cardinal Duka, Cardinal Fernandez has spread and according to which the faithful “must accept the declaration of the Argentine bishops and their interpretation [of Amoris Laetitia regarding the reception of Communion by divorced people] with religious obedience of mind and will”, Cardinal Müller said: “This was already heretical, but it was not the Pope who said it”. [60]
Cardinal Fernandez’s statements are therefore heretical, according to the German cardinal, and this is further reiterated by other words of the latter according to which: “At the moment, there exists a heretical but career-enhancing position, according to which God reveals himself only to Pope Francis through direct information in the Holy Spirit, and according to which the bishops must only blindly repeat these celestial illuminations and transmit them mechanically like talking puppets. The bishop, on the other hand, by virtue of his consecration, is the successor of the Apostles and the authentic teacher of the Gospel of Christ, but in the college of all bishops with the Pope as the ever-present and visible principle of the unity of the Church in revealed truth and in its sacramental communion. This is the true doctrine of the primacy of the Pope and not the neo-papalism of those who want to hand over the Church of Christ to the ideology of the atheistic and anti-human capitalism of Davos. … Every Catholic believes in the divine and Catholic truth that in Peter the bishops of Rome are installed as his legitimate successors. But as a theologically enlightened disciple of Christ, he opposes the caricature of the papacy both in the anti-Roman polemics of the reformers of the time and in the parrot-like understanding of non-Catholic neo-papalism or papagayism … “ [61]
These words of the German Cardinal evidently define as heresy the affirmations of Cardinal Fernandez, according to which for the custody of the deposit of faith there is a particular charism, a unique charism, which the Lord has given only to Peter and his successors, a living and working gift, which works in the person of the Holy Father; if it were said that some bishops have a special gift of the Holy Spirit to judge the doctrine of the Holy Father, we would enter into a vicious circle and this would be heresy and schism; heretics always think they know the true doctrine of the Church and that in this error of judgment of the Pope not only some progressives fall but, paradoxically, also some traditionalist groups. [62]
The words of Cardinal Muller are particularly enlightening and strong but require some clarifications:
1) the statements that Cardinal Muller indicates as heretical have been approved by you, Pope Francis, or have not been condemned by you, as was your duty;
2) formal heresy occurs when the subject, after having made heretical statements and having been warned of the contrast between his statements and the deposit of faith, perseveres in such heresies; the perverse will and intention are manifested in this obstinate perseverance in error as fundamentally indicated by the Gospel (Mt 18:15-17) and as Cardinal Burke [63] highlighted in a famous conference ; but the Pope, that is, you, have been warned several times of your errors and your heresies.
As good Catholic doctrine teaches, the history of the Church and as clearly indicated in the first volume of the book already cited, the Pope can become a heretic and can also fall from the Pontificate, therefore he can and must be judged on his doctrinal errors which harm souls, as Cardinal Müller explained [64] and as saints and Pontiffs have also said in the past [65] .
The Pope is not above the Word of God and Tradition but at their service [66] ; he must not decide according to his own will, but according to the will of the Lord, who speaks to man through Holy Scripture and Tradition; the ministry of the Vicar of Christ has limits that proceed from the law of God and from the inviolable divine constitution of the Church contained in Revelation. [67] The Pope does not have absolute power. [68]
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states at n. 85 that the Pope must interpret the Word of God, written or transmitted. [69] The interpretation of which the text just quoted speaks is precisely interpretation, not betrayal and not alteration [70] .
The German Bishops affirmed that: “The Pope is subject to divine law and bound by the order given by Jesus Christ to his Church. The Pope cannot modify the constitution which the Church has received from its Founder…. The Constitution of the Church rests on its hinges on a foundation which comes from God and therefore cannot be at the mercy of human whim…. As the Vatican Council has explained in clear and comprehensible words and as the very nature of the thing manifests, infallibility is a property which refers only to the supreme Magisterium of the Pope; and this coincides precisely with the scope of the infallible Magisterium of the Church in general and is linked to what is contained in Sacred Scripture and in Tradition, as well as to the definitions already issued by the ecclesiastical Magisterium” [71] .
In particular, as St. John Paul II explains, “8. The Roman Pontiff … has the “sacra potestas” to teach the truth of the Gospel, to administer the sacraments and to govern the Church pastorally in the name and with the authority of Christ, but this power does not include in itself any power over the natural or positive divine law.” [72]
When the Pope tramples on the deposit of faith to impose his erroneous views it is evident that he is perverting Catholic doctrine and is acting as a heretic and harming souls.
Along these lines, other prelates have also made similar statements to those of the German Cardinal Müller, seen above, and with them great Catholic theologians and intellectuals. The famous Oxford professor, John Finnis, former member of the International Theological Commission of the Holy See from 1986 to 1991, member of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (from 1990 to 1995) and of the Pontifical Academy Pro Vita (from 2001 to 2016), significantly stated in a commentary on a book: “With admirable lucidity and a wealth of evidence and argument, this timely book collects the main published documents making the case that heresies designedly put about by Pope Francis are today a primary cause and manifestation of Christianity’s worst crisis ever.” [73] Which we can translate thus: with admirable lucidity and a wealth of evidence and argument, this timely book brings together the major published documents demonstrating that the heresies engineered by Pope Francis are today a primary cause and manifestation of the worst crisis of Christianity ever.
I remember that some great theological experts and professors at Pontifical Universities, such as Professor Rist, Professor Livi, Professor Aidan Nichols op, have defined some of your positions, Pope Francis, as heretical. [74]
Although he was excommunicated for not recognizing you as Pope, and in this I dissociated myself from the Archbishop’s statements, it seems useful to me to report the strong words of Msgr. Viganò which indicate how the statements of you, Pope Francis, are scandalizing souls; we know well that Msgr. Viganò is not a madman but a person who has served the Church with honor and who speaks affirming many truths; I underline how Msgr. Viganò also spoke of heresies spread by you, Pope Francis [75] .
Basically something similar was said by Msgr. Aguer when he stated: … “The style is that of dissimulation typical of Pope Francis: things are said without too much conviction, but in such a way as to be fully understood, contrary to Tradition. …” The Archbishop then stated that: “Fiducia Supplicans shows where the eighth chapter of the exhortation Amoris laetitia was pointing” and that now the plan of Pope Francis is revealed in all its reality, which is implemented through dissimulation, through this plan: “the current pontificate on numerous questions proposes a new position that corrects the doctrine of the Church. And its unalterable Tradition.” Which is equivalent to saying that this Pontificate spreads errors of a practically heretical level [76] , in that they oppose the Tradition which cannot be altered! [77]
For Cardinal Sarah, the “Fiducia supplicans” contains a real heresy which must be radically opposed, for the good of the Church [78] .
Msgr. Schneider also significantly stated that Pope Francis is “de facto” promoting heresy [79] .
It is truly a serious thing what the Pope, that is you, is doing with the collaboration of various prelates but the Judgement of God will come and indeed it is already manifest … in fact many books and articles highlight the serious errors that you are spreading but you do not accept these corrections and persevere in your serious errors that cause great scandal; obviously you cannot oppose anything to the Truth that great and courageous experts present against your statements, but you make yourselves strong with the power that God has granted you and the support that you have from the powers of the world that precisely support you because you are corrupting the sound doctrine and you are deviating at a moral level many souls, for this reason the great newspapers that heavily criticized Benedict XVI praise and support you …
And do not tell me that through the grave errors indicated you are making Catholic doctrine evolve , the books cited [80] clearly show that this is not true, the statements of a certain St. John Newman and good Catholic doctrine condemn your statements and those who want to affirm that you are making Catholic doctrine evolve.
St. John Henry Newman, a famous English theologian and Cardinal, indicated seven principles necessary to verify that the interpretation of dogmas and the development of doctrine is carried out correctly and is not a deformation or a destruction of the truth spread by Christ: “
1) Preservation of the type…
2) Continuity of principles …
3) Power of assimilation …
4) Logical consequence…
5) Anticipation of the future …
6) Preservative influence of the past …
7) Lasting strength …” [81]
Saint JH Newman said.: “There is no corruption if it retains one and the same type, the same principles, the same organization; if its beginnings anticipate its subsequent phases, and its later phenomena protect and subserve its earlier; if it has a power of assimilation and revival, and a vigorous action from first to last.” [82]
There is no corruption if it retains the same type, the same principles, the same organization; if its beginnings anticipate its successive phases, and its successive phenomena protect and preserve those preceding them; if it has a power of assimilation and rebirth, and a vigorous action from first to last.
Yes said. Thomas Aquinas: “Dicendum quod hoc pro firmo est tenendum, unam esse fidem antiquorum et modernum: alias non esset una Ecclesia.”(De veritate, q. 14, a. 12c). … it must be firmly maintained that the faith of the ancients and the moderns is one, otherwise the Church would not be one. To always be one, the Church must profess one faith; the unity of the Church implies the unity of faith.
You are perverting and changing the doctrine and you are not making it evolve and obviously your errors and your doctrinal perversions have nothing to do with the holiness and truth that the Church has always spread .
The evolution of Catholic doctrine regarding slavery, for example, has followed the line indicated by St. JH Newman through centuries of studies… you are carrying out what you call in various cases “evolution” in a few years and under the same Pope, that is, you, that is, you are presenting doctrines of yours that are completely opposed to Tradition and that have nothing to do with the evolution of doctrine… I repeat: what you want to present as the evolution of the doctrine of the Church are your ideas contrary to Catholic doctrine and in total opposition to Tradition for a true perversion of Catholic doctrine, as clearly stated in the books cited [83] .
The true evolution of doctrine takes place in transparency and clarity, as can be seen in the course of the history of the Church and the evolution of its doctrine, but the Pope, that is, you, is carrying out your work with dissimulation, as Mgr. Aguer said [84] and as emerges from your own words: “If we speak explicitly of communion for divorced and remarried people, you don’t know what a mess they will cause. So let’s not speak about it directly, make sure that the premises are there, then I will draw the conclusions”. [85]
These are not the words of a Pope who wants to evolve Catholic doctrine in the Light of Christ and in the transparency of the Truth… they are the words of a person who wants to secretly pervert the Truth of Christ and who then in fact perverted it with great scandal.
Similar strategies have been used to properly manipulate various Synods [86] so that they would state what the Pope wanted in order to carry out such subversion; Cardinal Baldisseri spoke very clearly about all this, perhaps thinking he would not be listened to [87] ; E. Pentin in his “The Rigging … “ [88] states:
“Marco Tosatti, Vaticanist for La Stampa, reports that Cardinal Baldisseri was overheard in a restaurant somewhere in Europe, explaining how the extraordinary synod was going to be manipulated in order to achieve a desired result. He said that this would involve asking that the written presentations be handed in well in advance and that all the presentations had to be read carefully. “If some presentations appear to be problematic,” the cardinal reportedly said, “say that unfortunately there isn’t enough time to allow everyone to speak, but nonetheless the text has been received and remains in the records and is sure to be taken into account in the final report.” [89]
Which, translated, means: Marco Tosatti, Vatican correspondent for La Stampa, reports that Cardinal Baldisseri was heard in a restaurant somewhere in Europe, explaining how the extraordinary synod would be manipulated to achieve the desired outcome. He said that this would involve requiring written presentations to be submitted well in advance and that all presentations should be read carefully. “If some presentations appear to be problematic,” the Cardinal reported, “it is said that unfortunately there is not enough time to allow everyone to speak, but nevertheless the text has been received and remains in the records and is sure to be taken into account in the final report.” We understand well that Pentin is speaking of the meeting reported by Tosatti in the article indicated above [90] and that, therefore, the Cardinal who made those statements was Cardinal Baldisseri, secretary of the Synod! Such statements carry exceptional weight in understanding how things went, then. As Tosatti indicated, quoting Baldisseri’s words: the final document, I underline, was not supposed to be clear and definitive, but based on a “fluctuating” interpretation so that each person, reading it, could pull it from the side that was most convenient for him…
You have manipulated the Synods to pass very serious errors and therefore harm souls.
In particular, the Sacraments invalidly and/or sacrilegiously received and administered to which you are opening the doors through Amoris Laetitia and through other documents, as demonstrated in the writings cited [91] , and the heresies connected to these documents of yours, as also explained by Cardinal Müller [92] as well as many other authors, as mentioned, do no good to the Church and to souls, indeed, they are a great harm which opens the doors to the damnation of many souls and, I fear, also of yours…
Your Holiness, return to teach the Truth of the Holy Gospel and erase all these errors. Repair the harm done and begin a new phase of the Pontificate.
Remember that God’s judgment will come against all the evil you are doing and I fear that for you it will be a radical condemnation not only for the damage you are producing to souls with your doctrinal errors and with the scandals you are causing but also for your war against the good Pastors of the Church who reaffirm the sound doctrine and implement it in the service of souls; the Pope, that is, you, in fact attacks them in various ways and in some cases removes them from their seats also producing serious damage to seminarians and the faithful as well as to priests.
God elevated you to the Papacy and has granted you more than 10 long years of Pontificate so far not to pervert the doctrine but to safeguard it and instead almost not a day goes by that we see the spread of the errors of yourself and your collaborators.
God continues to give you life also so that you can repair the damage you have caused, erase the errors you yourself have made and reaffirm sound doctrine but you continue with your program of perversion at a doctrinal level.
You have not been given power by God to work against the Truth but for the Truth;
St. Paul says, “We have no power against the truth, but for the truth” (2 Cor. 13:8)… But you are clearly working against the Truth and not for the Truth!
You can hide, especially thanks to the support of the powerful and your power, and thus you can mislead simple men into thinking that you have acted righteously… but you cannot deceive God!
Paul VI stated: “It is a divinely revealed doctrine that sins entail punishments inflicted by the holiness and justice of God, to be paid for both on this earth, with the pains, miseries and calamities of this life and above all with death, and in the afterlife also with fire and torments or with purifying punishments. Therefore the faithful have always been persuaded that the way of evil offers to those who undertake it many obstacles, bitterness and harm. These punishments are imposed according to justice and mercy by God for the purification of souls, for the defense of the sanctity of the moral order and to re-establish the glory of God in its full majesty. Every sin, in fact, causes a disturbance in the universal order, which God has arranged in his ineffable wisdom and infinite charity, and the destruction of immense goods both with respect to the sinner himself and with respect to the human community.” [93]
God will know how to give you the punishment you deserve and objectively speaking the punishment you deserve must be colossal, of eternal and terrible damnation, you have in fact scandalized souls in various ways and opened the way to invalid Sacraments, you have directed souls towards a path of damnation and not of salvation in particular through Amoris Laetitia as well as through other actions and omissions.
“As you have done, so it will be done to you; what you have done to others will fall upon your own head.” (Obadiah 1). The harm you are doing to so many souls will fall upon you heavily!
For the love of God, for your love and for the love of souls, convert, reprove the errors you have spread and repair the evil you have done!
The Lord is allowing you to carry on this doctrinal perversion; similarly, according to the Bible, he allowed Saul to do evil for a long time, he allowed Ahab’s bad actions for a long time, he allowed other characters in history to work against the divine will for a long time with great damage to souls … but the time of reckoning before God and for just condemnation has come for all of them and it will come for you too!
And you cannot say that you did not know… many have tried to bring you back to the path of good doctrine… but you persisted in your errors.
I emphasize that despite your attack on the Truth of Christ, it continues to make itself heard … the statements of courageous and wise Cardinals such as Muller, Burke, Brandmuller, Meisner, Caffarra etc. the statements of Msgr. Viganò, of Msgr. Aguer, of Msgr. Livi, of Fr. Nichol, of professors Rist, Lamont etc. the books of H. Syre, those of other authors and also those cited, the various letters and corrections that many Catholic theologians and intellectuals have written to highlight your errors and heresies as well as the hundreds of articles that unmask and condemn your errors in many Catholic blogs around the world are an intangible monument that testifies how God has continued to reiterate the sound doctrine through many Catholics while the Pope and his collaborators were scandalously undermining it.
Never has the Church had a time of such great doctrinal perversion as today, the famous philosopher and theologian Finnis has clearly said: the heresies planned by Pope Francis are today a primary cause and a manifestation of the worst crisis ever existed in Christianity … we are in the worst crisis ever existed in Christianity and you are the main cause! [94]
As Blessed Schuster wrote, Pope John XXII: “… has grave responsibilities before the tribunal of history (…)”, because “he offered the entire Church the humiliating spectacle of princes, clergy and universities putting the Pontiff back on the right path of Catholic theological tradition, placing him in the harsh necessity of recanting himself”. [95]
Your responsibility appears even more serious because your errors, unlike the error of John XXII, are opposed to the Catholic Truth on many points of doctrine, not for nothing have various Cardinals said that the Pope is implementing a “paradigm shift” meaning that the Pontiff is implementing a doctrinal change on a radical level; Cardinal Muller significantly stated in this regard: “Behind the pseudo-intellectual discourse of the ‘paradigm shift’, there is only the undisguised heresy that falsifies the word of God”. [96]
The Truth that you are trampling upon, however, is already re-emerging and will re-emerge ever more fully, increasingly unmasking your ambiguities and errors as well as heresies, and history will also judge you negatively precisely for the doctrinal damage and scandals that you have created in this period.
God evidently does not bless your Pontificate and significantly has concentrated in it: a colossal global epidemic, the terrible rise of the satanic ISIS, the war between Ukraine and Russia, the war between Israel and Hamas, and many defections from the Catholic Church, schisms, clashes between Pastors.
I don’t know if all these are to be considered punishments inflicted by God also because the Vicar of Christ behaves in a way that is clearly contrary to how he should, certainly a Pontificate like this deserves radical and strong condemnation from God and men.
Have the courage to recognize your errors, to ask for forgiveness, to cancel the doctrinal perversions, even heretical ones, that you are spreading and to repair the harm that you have done to many Bishops, many priests and many good Catholics.
I thank God who gives me the ability to speak to you with frankness and courage, in Him and with Him I fear nothing of what you can do to me.
I am a child of God and I speak to you in the light of His Almighty Spirit.
It is not I who have to fear, it is you, for the harm you have caused to souls.
I pray continually for your conversion.
I hope that, like John XXII, you too, Pope Francis, will retract your errors before leaving this life.
May God enlighten you and touch your heart.
May Christ reign!
NB THE LETTER MUST BE SIGNED
[1] Pontificio Consiglio per i Testi Legislativi , “Dichiarazione circa l’ammissibilità alla Santa Comunione dei divorziati risposati”, 24 giugno 2000, n.1 www.vatican.va https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/intrptxt/documents/rc_pc_intrptxt_doc_20000706_declaration_it.html
[2] Chiesa e post Concilio “Comunione a Joe Biden, il Vaticano frena i vescovi statunitensi” 11.5.2021 chiesaepostconcilio.blogspot.com https://chiesaepostconcilio.blogspot.com/2021/05/comunione-joe-biden-il-vaticano-frena-i.html; tg24.sky.it “Nyt, Vaticano a vescovi Usa: “Non neghino comunione a Biden per sua posizione su aborto”” 15.6.2021 tg24.sky.it https://tg24.sky.it/mondo/2021/06/15/comunione-biden-vaticano-usa
[3] Niccolò Magnani “Comunione a Biden, ok Papa: ira vescovi Usa/ “Francesco, l’aborto è sacrilegio!”” 1.11.2021, www.ilsussidiario.net, https://www.ilsussidiario.net/news/comunione-a-biden-ok-papa-ira-vescovi-usa-francesco-laborto-e-sacrilegio/2244042/
[4] ANSA “Il Papa dà la comunione a Nancy Pelosi, il vescovo non voleva” 9.6.2022 www.ansa.it https://www.ansa.it/amp/sito/notizie/cronaca/2022/06/29/il-papa-da-la-comunione-a-nancy-pelosi-il-vescovo-non-voleva_6a1b4dcf-fc9e-4db1-8370-857eb60ba932.html
[5] Robert W. McElroy “Cardinal McElroy on ‘radical inclusion’ for L.G.B.T. people, women and others in the Catholic Church.” www.americamagazine.org 24.1.2023 https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2023/01/24/mcelroy-synodality-inclusion-244587
[6] Pontificio Consiglio per i Testi Legislativi , “Dichiarazione circa l’ammissibilità alla Santa Comunione dei divorziati risposati”, 24 giugno 2000, n.1 www.vatican.va https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/intrptxt/documents/rc_pc_intrptxt_doc_20000706_declaration_it.html
[7] Si veda l’ottavo capitolo del libro T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” a questo link : https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/capitolo-viii-crollo-della-morale-cristiana-attraverso-la-dottrina-bergogliana-su-attenuanti-scusanti-e-bene-possibile/
[8] Ampia confutazione dei vostri errori riguardo alla piena di morte nel VI capitolo del libro: T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia””, testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[9] Tullio Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” capitoli 4 e 7, vol. I , testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[10] Si veda l’ottavo capitolo del libro: T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” a questo link : https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/capitolo-viii-crollo-della-morale-cristiana-attraverso-la-dottrina-bergogliana-su-attenuanti-scusanti-e-bene-possibile/
[11] Si veda l’ottavo capitolo del libro: T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” a questo link : https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/capitolo-viii-crollo-della-morale-cristiana-attraverso-la-dottrina-bergogliana-su-attenuanti-scusanti-e-bene-possibile/
[12] Si veda l’ottavo capitolo del libro: T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” a questo link : https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/capitolo-viii-crollo-della-morale-cristiana-attraverso-la-dottrina-bergogliana-su-attenuanti-scusanti-e-bene-possibile/
[13] Tullio Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. II , testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[14] Tullio Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” cap. 8, vol. II , testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[15] D. Tullio Rotondo “Il predicatore degli esercizi spirituali per il Sinodo sulla Sinodalità sarà padre Radcliffe, op, chiaramente schierato a favore degli atti omosessuali.” https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/il-predicatore-degli-esercizi-spirituali-per-il-sinodo-sulla-sinodalita-sara-padre-radcliffe-op-chiaramente-schierato-a-favore-degli-atti-omosessuali/
[16] Tullio Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. II , testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[17] Tullio Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. II , testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[18] M. Tosatti “Viganò intervista esclusiva. Il papa e i sodomiti nella Chiesa” 25.7.2020 www.marcotosatti.com https://www.marcotosatti.com/2020/07/25/vigano-intervista-esclusiva-il-papa-e-i-sodomiti-nella-chiesa/
[19] M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller endorses cardinals’ dubia on the Synod on Synodality.” 2.10.2023 www.lifesitenews.com https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/cardinal-Müller-endorses-cardinals-dubia-on-the-synod-on-synodality/
[20] S. Magister “Fiducia supplicans”. Il cardinale Sarah: “Ci opponiamo a un’eresia che mina gravemente la Chiesa” 8.1.2024 www.diakonos.be https://www.diakonos.be/fiducia-supplicans-il-cardinale-sarah-ci-opponiamo-a-uneresia-che-mina-gravemente-la-chiesa/
[21] Si veda in particolare l’amplissimo cap. 7 del libro T. Rotondo: “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” , tale capitolo occupa tutto vol. II , il testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[22] Si veda il suo libro in cui considera leciti gli atti omosessuali, A. Fumagalli: “L’amore possibile” ed. Cittadella 2020
[23]Cfr. A. Fumagalli “L’amore possibile. Persone omosessuali e morale cristiana.” Cittadella Editrice 2020 pp. 153 ss.
[24] Si veda T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. II , p. 753 ss, il testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[25] L. Moia “Il libro. Omosessuali, le risposte necessarie.” https://www.avvenire.it/chiesa/pagine/omosessuali-libro-fumagalli-prefazione-semeraro ;
[26] Graziano “Concordantia discordantium Canonum.” Pars I , Distinct.83. canon.Error http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/collections/cul/texts/ldpd_6029936_001/pages/ldpd_6029936_001_00000205.html?toggle=image&menu=maximize&top=&left= ; testo citato da s. Roberto Bellarmino nelle sue Controversie nella parte relativa ai Concili, libro I n. 14
[27] Graziano “Concordantia discordantium Canonum.” Pars I , Distinct.83. canon.Error http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/collections/cul/texts/ldpd_6029936_001/pages/ldpd_6029936_001_00000205.html?toggle=image&menu=maximize&top=&left=
[28] S. Paciolla “Protesta contro gli atti sacrileghi di Papa Francesco” https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/protesta-contro-gli-atti-sacrileghi-di-papa-francesco/ ; guardi anche questi link che parlano degli interventi del Cardinale Muller del Card. Burke, del Vescovo Schneider e di altri su questo argomento “Torniamo sullo scandalo della Pachamama.” https://fsspx.news/it/news/torniamo-sullo-scandalo-della-pachamama-22839 ; Il Cardinale Burke è intervenuto “Burke su Pachamama: “Forze demoniache a San Pietro”.” https://www.ilgiornale.it/news/cronache/burke-parla-forze-diaboliche-san-pietro-pachamama-1798287.html ; https://lanuovabq.it/it/il-papa-e-le-statuette-una-situazione-surreale ;
[29] R. Cascioli “ Il Papa e le statuette, una situazione surreale.” https://lanuovabq.it/it/il-papa-e-le-statuette-una-situazione-surreale
[30] Mons. Aguer “Papa Francesco, gli insulti ai preti e il fenomeno dei sacerdoti cancellati.” 30.11.2023 https://blog.messainlatino.it/2023/12/papa-francesco-gli-insulti-ai-preti-e.html
[31] E. A. Allen “Survivor says delays, lack of transparency on abuse cases is ‘retraumatizing’.” https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2024/10/survivor-says-delays-lack-of-transparency-on-abuse-cases-is-retraumatizing
[32] “Cattolici di Hong Kong ai vescovi del mondo: Fermate il possibile accordo fra Cina e Santa Sede.” https://www.asianews.it/notizie-it/Cattolici-di-Hong-Kong-ai-vescovi-del-mondo:-Fermate-il-possibile-accordo-fra-Cina-e-Santa-Sede-43079.html
[33] Spiega p. Creveller “Altro elemento “diseguale” di questo Accordo è la “nomina” dei vescovi da parte del Papa: è pur vero che egli li “nomina”, ma non li “sceglie”. Ed è questa la parte segreta dell’Accordo. Il governo cinese sceglie i candidati (ma quanti?) ed il Papa è libero soltanto di prescegliere uno dei candidati offertigli. “Il Vaticano e la Cina: Accordi e disaccordi” https://www.rotarymilanocastello.it/stories/il-vaticano-e-la-cina-accordi-e-disaccordi
[34] S. Fontana “Il Papa e la Cina: un grave errore di prospettiva”. https://lanuovabq.it/it/il-papa-e-la-cina-un-grave-errore-di-prospettiva; M. Matzuzzi “Così la Cina detta legge al Vaticano” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2024/05/23/news/cosi-la-cina-detta-legge-al-vaticano-6570550/
[35] M. Matzuzzi “Così la Cina detta legge al Vaticano” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2024/05/23/news/cosi-la-cina-detta-legge-al-vaticano-6570550/
[36]“ Cattolici di Hong Kong ai vescovi del mondo: Fermate il possibile accordo fra Cina e Santa Sede.” https://www.asianews.it/notizie-it/Cattolici-di-Hong-Kong-ai-vescovi-del-mondo:-Fermate-il-possibile-accordo-fra-Cina-e-Santa-Sede-43079.html
[37] “Il Vaticano e la Cina: Accordi e disaccordi” https://www.rotarymilanocastello.it/stories/il-vaticano-e-la-cina-accordi-e-disaccordi
[38] Significativo “ l’articolo che il card. Joseph Zen, vescovo emerito di Hong Kong, ha postato oggi sul suo blog, a proposito dei fatti raccontati da AsiaNews, secondo cui un prelato vaticano avrebbe chiesto ai vescovi di Shantou e Mindong, sotterranei e riconosciuti dalla Santa Sede, di ritrarsi per lasciare spazio a due vescovi illeciti e scomunicati.” J. Zen “ll card. Zen sui vescovi di Shantou e Mindong” https://www.asianews.it/notizie-it/Il-card.-Zen-sui-vescovi-di-Shantou-e-Mindong-42951.html Come spiega un conoscitore delle affermazioni del porporato : “Il cardinale Zen è assai critico nei confronti dell’atteggiamento della Santa Sede sul dossier cinese. La novella Ostpolitik vaticana non gli piace, non ci vede alcun lato positivo: altro non è che un appeasement, una resa senza condizioni.” M. Matzuzzi “La Cina spiegata al Papa.” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2020/06/15/news/la-cina-spiegata-al-papa-320995/
[39] J. Zen “ll card. Zen sui vescovi di Shantou e Mindong” https://www.asianews.it/notizie-it/Il-card.-Zen-sui-vescovi-di-Shantou-e-Mindong-42951.html
[40] M. Matzuzzi “La Cina spiegata al Papa.” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2020/06/15/news/la-cina-spiegata-al-papa-320995/ Come spiegano vari intellettuali cinesi, questi Vescovi : “… non godono della fiducia dei fedeli e non hanno mai espresso il loro pentimento in pubblico. Se essi vengono riconosciuti come legittimi, i fedeli della Cina sarebbero gettati nella confusione e nel dolore e si creerebbe uno scisma nella Chiesa in Cina.” “Cattolici di Hong Kong ai vescovi del mondo: Fermate il possibile accordo fra Cina e Santa Sede.” https://www.asianews.it/notizie-it/Cattolici-di-Hong-Kong-ai-vescovi-del-mondo:-Fermate-il-possibile-accordo-fra-Cina-e-Santa-Sede-43079.html
[41] Spiega p. Creveller “ … questo accordo ha indebolito la Chiesa del proprio ruolo profetico: è visibile che il Papa parli apertamente contro le violazioni dei diritti umani in qualunque direzione, ma non contro la Cina … con l’Accordo la Cina guadagna – gratuitamente – in standing e credibilità internazionale: la Santa Sede, ad esempio, è l’unica entità internazionale a riconoscere la Repubblica di Taiwan, quindi l’Accordo può essere “venduto” dalla Cina come un accreditamento. Del resto, l’importanza di questo Accordo non può certo valutarsi sul piano meramente numerico: esso ha portato alla nomina di soli 4 vescovi, 2 nel 2018-20 e due successivamente; la Chiesa ha riconosciuto i vescovi precedentemente nominati dal Governo cinese, ma non ha visto riconoscere nessuno dei 30 “clandestini” nominati in precedenza dalla Santa Sede.” “Il Vaticano e la Cina: Accordi e disaccordi” https://www.rotarymilanocastello.it/stories/il-vaticano-e-la-cina-accordi-e-disaccordi
- Cascioli “Cina e cardinale Zen, le “strane” parole del Papa “ https://lanuovabq.it/it/cina-e-cardinale-zen-le-strane-parole-del-papa
[42] R. Cascioli “Cina e cardinale Zen, le “strane” parole del Papa “ https://lanuovabq.it/it/cina-e-cardinale-zen-le-strane-parole-del-papa”.
[43] R. Cascioli ha precisato a riguardo: “C’è però un’ultima questione che merita attenzione: il Papa non sa dire se in Cina ci sia la democrazia o no, il che già di per sé è un’affermazione assurda…. . E il problema della Cina è proprio la mancanza di libertà per la Chiesa, sottoposta sempre più al controllo del Partito Comunista, grazie anche all’accordo segreto voluto dalla Santa Sede e pronto per essere rinnovato di altri due anni.” R. Cascioli “Cina e cardinale Zen, le “strane” parole del Papa “ https://lanuovabq.it/it/cina-e-cardinale-zen-le-strane-parole-del-papa” Riprendendo le parole del Cardinale Zen, un giornalista ha affermato riguardo a cos’è davvero la Cina: è “… l’opposto del Paradiso in terra. Una paese immenso dove l’unico culto davvero consentito è quello del Partito cui le religioni – tutte – devono sottomettersi. Salvando magari la faccia attraverso qualche accordo (di solito segreto) con chi quelle religioni le rappresenta e che, nell’ottica di Pechino, restano sempre agenti esterni, stranieri.”M. Matzuzzi “La Cina spiegata al Papa.” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2020/06/15/news/la-cina-spiegata-al-papa-320995/
[44] M. Matzuzzi “La Cina spiegata al Papa.” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2020/06/15/news/la-cina-spiegata-al-papa-320995/
[45] M. Matzuzzi “La Cina spiegata al Papa.” https://www.ilfoglio.it/chiesa/2020/06/15/news/la-cina-spiegata-al-papa-320995/
[46] S. Mazza “CITTÀ DEL VATICANO. Santa Sede: «In Cina violata libertà religiosa»”17.12.2010 https://www.avvenire.it/mondo/pagine/vaticano-cina-violazione-liberta-religiosa_201012171140234700000
[47] R. Cascioli “Cina e cardinale Zen, le “strane” parole del Papa “ https://lanuovabq.it/it/cina-e-cardinale-zen-le-strane-parole-del-papa spiega la radicale differenza tra il dialogo con la Cina realizzato da Benedetto e quello realizzato da Francesco
[48] Cfr. Tullio Rotondo “I provvedimenti normativi del Governo italiano con cui le persone sono state praticamente costrette a sottoporsi ai vaccini anti – Covid sono immorali.” https://www.academia.edu/54561083/I_provvedimenti_normativi_del_Governo_italiano_con_cui_le_persone_sono_state_praticamente_costrette_a_sottoporsi_ai_vaccini_anti_Covid_sono_immorali ; id. “Risposta al card Eijk riguardo all’obbligatorietà morale di ricevere i vaccini anti Covid.” https://www.academia.edu/65235269/Risposta_al_card_Eijk_riguardo_allobbligatoriet%C3%A0_morale_di_ricevere_i_vaccini_anti_Covid ; id. “Gli attuali “vaccini” anti-Covid sono sperimentali.” https://lucediverit.wordpress.com/2022/03/16/gli-attuali-vaccini-anti-covid-sono-sperimentali/ ; La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana “Paolo Bellavite – vaccino: tutto quello che non vi hanno detto.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana 30.1.2021 con relativo video: https://youtu.be/_nh1R0aGwVM cfr. Bellavite P. and Donzelli A. “Adverse events following measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine: an independent perspective on Italian pharmacovigilance data” [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1176 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26523.2 ; sul canale del prof. Bellavite si trovano importanti indicazioni Canale Telegram PBellavite https://t.me/PaoloBellavite/1657 ; importante video sulla sperimentalità dei vaccini Covid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jRZwAVgQXY
[49] Cfr. Margherita Enrico “Intervista a L. Montagnier “Confermo, i vaccini non sono sicuri. Hanno effetti ancora sconosciuti.” in La Verità, 8.9.2021; anche il professor Peter Mc Cullogh ha detto questo chiaramente nel suo canale Telegram https://t.me/PeterMcCullough/10 , https://t.me/PeterMcCullough/9 ; https://t.me/PeterMcCullough/8 ; si vedano sul sito dell’ Ema i Risk Management Plans dei vari vaccini anti Covid : Risk Management Plans https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/marketing-authorisation/pharmacovigilance/risk-management/risk-management-plans ; ad es. per il vaccino Comirnaty www.ema.europa.eu , https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/rmp-summary/comirnaty-epar-risk-management-plan_en.pdf molti altri importanti documenti su questo argomento si trovano nei canali del prof. McCullough https://t.me/PeterMcCulloughMD e del dottor Malone https://t.me/RWMaloneMD
[50] I due interventi sono contenuti nel seguente video: Radio Radio TV “”STIAMO ESPONENDO MILIONI DI PERSONE A UNA PROTEINA TOSSICA” ▷ L’ALLARME IN SENATO DEL DOTT BIZZARRI” Radio Radio TV; 8.10.2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv1riHigy1k ; Costantino Ceoldo “La scienza in Italia al tempo del Covid” 17.9.2021 www.geopolitica.ru https://www.geopolitica.ru/it/article/la-scienza-italia-al-tempo-del-covid ; La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana “Paolo Bellavite – vaccino: tutto quello che non vi hanno detto.” La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana 30.1.2021; https://youtu.be/_nh1R0aGwVM cfr. Bellavite P. and Donzelli A. “Adverse events following measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine: an independent perspective on Italian pharmacovigilance data” [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2021, 9:1176 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26523.2 ; sul canale del prof. Bellavite si trovano importanti indicazioni Canale Telegram PBellavite https://t.me/PaoloBellavite/1657
[51] Cfr. Margherita Enrico “Intervista a L. Montagnier “Confermo, i vaccini non sono sicuri. Hanno effetti ancora sconosciuti.” in La Verità, 8.9.2021
[52] I due esperti che parlano di questo sono il prof. Frajese e il prof. Bizzarri, i loro completi interventi potete ascoltarli a questi link https://www.byoblu.com/2021/06/18/ecco-perche-non-vaccinero-mia-figlia-il-potente-discorso-del-professor-giovanni-frajese/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv1riHigy1k&list=PLxc9r71hrCYCETWmsvvCAWifJ7C8QZctR&index=247&t=119s
[53] Veda questi articoli https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-and-recurrent-cancers-after-mrna-vaccines-studies-suggest-immune-changes_4669064.html ; Vaccini COVID-19 e cancro: i vaccini contro il COVID stanno causando un forte aumento dei tumori e quanto ciò può diventare grave? Il vaccino COVID sta sconvolgendo il sistema immunitario. https://palexander.substack.com/p/covid-19-gene-vaccines-and-cancer ; Vaccinazione COVID e turbo-cancro, cioè cancro che evolve inusualmente e rapidamente verso la morte del paziente : evidenze patologiche https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-vaccination-and-turbo-cancer-pathological-evidence/ ; Vaccinazione COVID e turbo-cancro, cioè cancro che evolve inusualmente e rapidamente verso la morte del paziente : evidenze patologiche https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-vaccination-and-turbo-cancer-pathological-evidence/ ; i vaccini possono provocare cancro, secondo la dott.ssa Bolgan , il prof. Tritto spiega che provocano immunodepressione https://t.me/DonTullioRotondo1/1483;
[54] “7 argomenti contro la vaccinazione obbligatoria” https://7argumente.de/ ; Canale Telegram del prof. Bellavite https://t.me/PaoloBellavite/2358 , https://t.me/PaoloBellavite/2359 ; https://t.me/PaoloBellavite/2170
[55] E. Pentin “Top COVID-19 Expert: Vatican Violating Code of Bioethics, Must End Vaccine Mandate Now.” edwardpentin.co.uk 15.2.2022 https://edwardpentin.co.uk/top-covid-19-expert-vatican-violating-code-of-bioethics-must-end-vaccine-mandate-now/
[56] P. Gulisano “La vicenda del vescovo Torres: rimosso per non aver ceduto al culto del dio vaccino.” https://www.paologulisano.com/la-vicenda-del-vescovo-torres-rimosso-per-non-aver-ceduto-al-culto-del-dio-vaccino/
[57]G. L. Muller «Negare i sacramenti causa pandemia è agire contro lo Spirito Santo»https://lanuovabq.it/it/negare-i-sacramenti-causa-pandemia-e-agire-contro-lo-spirito-santo
[58]M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “ Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/
[59]M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “ Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/
[60]M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “ Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/
[61] M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller endorses cardinals’ dubia on the Synod on Synodality.” 2.10.2023 www.lifesitenews.com https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/cardinal-Müller-endorses-cardinals-dubia-on-the-synod-on-synodality/
[62] In una intervista l’allora mons. Fernández aveva affermato: “When we speak of obedience to the magisterium, this is understood in at least two senses, which are inseparable and equally important. One is the more static sense, of a “deposit of faith,” which we must guard and preserve unscathed. But on the other hand, there is a particular charism for this safeguarding, a unique charism, which the Lord has given only to Peter and his successors. In this case, we are not talking about a deposit, but about a living and active gift, which is at work in the person of the Holy Father. I do not have this charism, nor do you, nor does Cardinal Burke. Today only Pope Francis has it. Now, if you tell me that some bishops have a special gift of the Holy Spirit to judge the doctrine of the Holy Father, we will enter into a vicious circle (where anyone can claim to have the true doctrine) and that would be heresy and schism.” E. Pentin “Exclusive: Archbishop Fernández Warns Against Bishops Who Think They Can Judge ‘Doctrine of the Holy Father’.” 11.9.2023 www.ncregister.com https://www.ncregister.com/interview/exclusive-archbishop-fernandez-warns-against-bishops-who-think-they-can-judge-doctrine-of-the-holy-father
[63] Corrispondenza Romana “Il cardinale Burke affronta l’ipotesi del Papa eretico.” www.corrispondenzaromana.it 7 Aprile 2018 https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/il-cardinale-burke-affronta-lipotesi-del-papa-eretico/
[64]M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “ Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/
[65] Legga su questo punto ciò che affermo, riportando testi di santi e di Pontefici, nel I capitolo del I volume del libro “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso Amoris Laetitia” citato più sopra.
[66]Congregazione per la dottrina della Fede “Il primato del successore di s. Pietro nel mistero della Chiesa” 31.10.1998 n. 7 , www.vatican.va , http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19981031_primato-successore-pietro_it.html
[67]Cfr Dichiarazione collettiva dei Vescovi tedeschi, genn.-febbr. 1875: Heinrich Denzinger “Enchiridion symbolorum, definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum” a cura di P. Hünermann, Edizioni Dehoniane Bologna, 2003, n. 3114; Congregazione per la dottrina della Fede “Il primato del successore di s. Pietro nel mistero della Chiesa” 31.10.1998 n. 7 , www.vatican.va , http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19981031_primato-successore-pietro_it.html
[68]Cfr. Congregazione per la dottrina della Fede “Il primato del successore di s. Pietro nel mistero della Chiesa” 31.10.1998 n. 10 , www.vatican.va , , www.vatican.va , http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19981031_primato-successore-pietro_it.html)
[69]Concilio Vaticano II, Cost. dogm. “Dei Verbum” 18.11.1965 , 10: AAS 58 (1966) 822 ,www.vatican.va , http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_it.html
[70]Benedetto XVI, “Omelia del 7 maggio 2005” , www.vatican.va , https://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/it/homilies/2005/documents/hf_ben-xvi_hom_20050507_san-giovanni-laterano.html
[71]Dichiarazione dei Vescovi tedeschi 1875 , Denzinger “Enchiridion symbolorum, definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum” a cura di P. Hünermann, Edizioni Dehoniane Bologna, 2003 n. 3114; testo lodato e approvato da Papa Pio IX con la “Mirabilis illa constantia” del 1875, Heinrich Denzinger “Enchiridion symbolorum, definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum” a cura di P. Hünermann, Edizioni Dehoniane Bologna, 2003 n. 3117
[72]“Discorso di Giovanni Paolo II agli Officiali e Avvocati del Tribunale della Rota Romana per l’inaugurazione dell’anno giudiziario” del 21.1.2000, www.vatican.va , http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/it/speeches/2000/jan-mar/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20000121_rota-romana.html
[73]Recensione editoriale del libro realizzato a cura di John Lamont e Claudio Pierantoni intitolato “Defending the Faith Against Present Heresies”, Arouca Press, 2021 https://www.amazon.com/Defending-Faith-Against-Present-Heresies/dp/1989905412 http://aroucapress.com/defending-the-faith
[74]“Correctio Filialis De Haeresibus Propagatis”, http://www.correctiofilialis.org/it/; http://www.correctiofilialis.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Correctio-filialis_Italiano.pdf; Autori vari “Illustri studiosi laici ed ecclesiastici accusano Papa Francesco di eresia in una Lettera Aperta”, Chiesa e post concilio, http://chiesaepostconcilio.blogspot.com/2019/04/illustri-teologi-e-studiosi-accusano.html
[75] “E dovremmo inorridire nel sentire colui che si è seduto sul Soglio del Vicario di Cristo accusare come indietrismo la custodia del deposito della Fede, come rigidità la fedeltà all’insegnamento di Nostro Signore, come formalismo l’obbedienza a quanto Egli ha insegnato agli Apostoli. … Alle ennesime sconcertanti e scandalose esternazioni di Bergoglio rispondano per noi le parole del Venerabile Pontefice Pio XII: Dietro coloro che accusano la Chiesa di essere rigida c’è solo la perversione del Falso Profeta che attenta alla Verità di Cristo stesso. E così sia. Sia lodato Gesù Cristo..” Mons. C. M. Viganò “«DIETRO COLORO CHE ACCUSANO LA CHIESA DI ESSERE RIGIDA C’È SOLO LA PERVERSIONE DEL FALSO PROFETA» (Papa Pio XII) https://luisapiccarreta.it/diario-di-fede/il-falso-profeta/ ; Pio XII https://piusppxii.wordpress.com/2016/04/16/chi-accusa-la-chiesa-di-avere-una-morale-dura-e-rigida-in-realta-accusa-cristo/ Lo stesso Mons. Viganò ha commentato la notizia dell’ iniziativa dei Vescovi belgi con cui hanno istituito delle benedizioni per le coppie omosessuali dicendo: “Con grande scandalo per la salvezza delle anime e per l’onore della Chiesa di Cristo, la Conferenza Episcopale del Belgio ha approvato e pubblicato un rito di “benedizione” delle unioni omosessuali, contravvenendo sfrontatamente all’insegnamento immutabile del Magistero Cattolico, che considera tali unioni «intrinsecamente perverse» e che, come tali, non solo non le può benedire, ma deve anzi condannarle come contrarie alla Morale naturale.” Il prelato nota come tale documento si basi su Amoris Laetitia e afferma che il: “ … processo di dissoluzione dottrinale e morale portato avanti dalla setta bergogliana prosegue inarrestabile, incurante del disorientamento che esso provoca nei fedeli e dei danni incalcolabili che arreca alle anime.” Mons. Viganò definisce eretici in particolare i Vescovi belgi perché tali loro azioni a favore degli omosessuali sono contrarie al Vangelo. Mons. Viganò nota che il Papa, cioè Lei, fissa principi eterodossi nei suoi testi e i suoi complici nelle Diocesi passano alla scandalosa applicazione di essi, “nell’infernale tentativo di scardinare la Morale per obbedire allo spirito del mondo.” Secondo mons. Viganò vi è un vero e proprio: “piano deliberato e voluto dall’alto, che grazie al percorso sinodale vuole rendere autonomo l’Episcopato ribelle nel propagandare errori di Fede e di Morale, mentre con autoritarismo impedisce ai Vescovi fedeli di proclamare la Verità di CristoMons. C. M. Viganò “Viganò. La “Benedizione” di Coppie Omosessuali in Belgio è Eresia.” 21.9.2022 www.marcotosatti.com https://www.marcotosatti.com/2022/09/21/vigano-la-benedizione-di-coppie-omosessuali-in-belgio-e-eresia/ Mons. C. M. Viganò ha anche affermato: “Eresie materiali, eresie formali, idolatria, superficialità di ogni sorta: il Sommo Pontefice Bergoglio non cessa di umiliare pervicacemente la più alta autorità della Chiesa, “demitizzando” il Papato – come magari direbbe l’illustre compagno Karl Rahner. La sua azione mira a violare il Sacro Deposito e a sfregiare il Volto Cattolico della Sposa di Cristo, con il dire e con il fare, con le dissimulazioni e con le bugie, con quei suoi gesti plateali, di ostentata spontaneità, ma meticolosamente ideati e pianificati, attraverso i quali esalta se stesso, in una continua autocelebrazione narcisistica, mentre viene umiliata la figura del Romano Pontefice, oscurata quella del Dolce Cristo in terra.”Mons. C.M. Viganò “Un atto di accusa a papa Francesco e di amore alla Chiesa di S.E. mons. Carlo Maria Viganò” Corrispondenza Romana, 19-12-2019 https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/un-atto-di-accusa-a-papa-francesco-e-di-amore-alla-chiesa-di-s-e-mons-carlo-maria-vigano/ Lo stesso mons. Viganò ha ulteriormente affermato: “… lo stesso metodo è stato adottato nella redazione di Amoris Laetitia, in cui la disciplina della Chiesa in materia di adulterio e pubblico concubinato è stata formulata in modo tale da poter esser teoricamente interpretata in senso cattolico, mentre nei fatti è stata accolta proprio nell’unico e ovvio senso eretico che si voleva diffondere. Tant’è vero che quella chiave di lettura voluta da Bergoglio e dai suoi esegeti in materia di Comunione ai divorziati è assurta ad interpretatio authentica negli Acta Apostolicae Sedis.” Mons. C. M. Viganò“Perché la critica di Viganò sul Concilio va presa sul serio” in Corrispondenza Romana 21.9.2020 https://www.corrispondenzaromana.it/perche-la-critica-di-vigano-sul-concilio-va-presa-sul-serio/ Lo stesso prelato italiano ha aggiunto: “Celebriamo il Papato in una fase storica di grave crisi e di apostasia, assurta sino a quel Soglio su cui Pietro sedette per primo. E mentre ci si strazia il cuore nel contemplare le rovine causate dalla devastazione dei novatori in danno di tante anime e della gloria della Maestà divina; mentre imploriamo al Cielo una luce che ci permetta di comprendere come coniugare il Non prævalebunt con lo stillicidio di eresie e scandali diffusi da colui che la Provvidenza ci ha inflitto a capo del corpo ecclesiale come punizione per i peccati compiuti dalla Gerarchia in questi decenni; mentre vediamo serpeggiare la divisione tra quanti si illudevano di avere ancora un Papa segregato nel Monastero… e lo scisma nelle Diocesi dell’Europa del Nord con il loro sciagurato cammino sinodale fortissimamente voluto da Bergoglio, ci cade sotto gli occhi la profezia di Leone XIII di felice memoria, il quale volle inserire nella preghiera dell’Esorcismo contro Satana e gli angeli apostatici quelle tremende parole che all’epoca dovevano suonare quasi scandalose, ma che oggi comprendiamo nel loro senso soprannaturale … Nemici terribili hanno riempito la Chiesa, sposa dell’Agnello immacolato, di amarezze, l’hanno avvelenata con l’assenzio; hanno messo le loro empie mani su tutte le cose desiderabili. Là dove la sede del beatissimo Pietro e la Cattedra della verità fu costituita per illuminare le genti, ivi hanno posto il trono della loro abominazione ed empietà, affinché abbattendo il Pastore potessero disperdere anche il gregge. Non sono parole scritte a caso: esse vennero redatte dopo che Leone XIII, alla fine della Messa, ebbe una visione in cui il Signore concedeva a Satana un periodo di tempo di circa cent’anni per mettere alla prova gli uomini di Chiesa. … Tra i titoli del Romano Pontefice ricorre, assieme a Christi Vicarius, anche quello di Servus servorum Dei. Se il primo è stato sdegnosamente rifiutato da Bergoglio, la sua scelta di mantenere il secondo suona come una provocazione, come dimostrano le sue parole e le sue opere. Verrà il giorno in cui ai Presuli della Chiesa sarà chiesto di chiarire quali intrighi e quali cospirazioni abbiano potuto condurre sul Soglio chi agisce come servo dei servi di Satana, e per quale motivo essi abbiano assistito pavidamente alle sue intemperanze o si siano resi complici di questo orgoglioso tiranno eretico. Tremino coloro che sanno e che tacciono per falsa prudenza: col loro silenzio essi non proteggono l’onore della Santa Chiesa, né preservano dallo scandalo i semplici. Al contrario, essi sprofondano la Sposa dell’Agnello nell’ignominia e nell’umiliazione, e allontanano i fedeli dall’Arca di salvezza proprio nel momento del diluvio. Preghiamo perché il Signore si degni di concederci un santo Papa e dei santi governanti.”C. M. Viganò : “Cathedra Veritatis / Omelia dell’arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò nella festa della Cattedra di San Pietro in Roma.” www.aldomariavalli.it 19.1.2023 https://www.aldomariavalli.it/2023/01/19/cathedra-veritatis-omelia-dellarcivescovo-carlo-maria-vigano-nella-festa-della-cattedra-di-san-pietro-in-roma/
[76] Mons. Aguer non ha parlato precisamente di eresia ma lo hanno fatto altri, parlando degli errori di Papa Francesco, lo ha fatto in particolare il Cardinale Müller cfr. M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “; Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/ ; lo ha fatto mons. Schneider e altri con lui, si veda il paragrafo conclusivo del II volume del libro: “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso Amoris Laetitia” vol. I, cap. II, Appendice II, pp. 143ss, il libro è scaricabile interamente e gratuitamente a questo sito: www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it , https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[77]Mons. H. Aguer ““Fiducia Supplicans” no debe ser obedecida – Mons. Héctor Aguer” 23.12.2023 centropieper.blogspot.com https://centropieper.blogspot.com/2023/12/fiducia-supplicans-no-debe-ser.html
[78] S. Magister “Fiducia supplicans”. Il cardinale Sarah: “Ci opponiamo a un’eresia che mina gravemente la Chiesa” 8.1.2024 www.diakonos.be https://www.diakonos.be/fiducia-supplicans-il-cardinale-sarah-ci-opponiamo-a-uneresia-che-mina-gravemente-la-chiesa/
[79] The Frontline TV “Is Pope Francis A Heretic?? – Bishop Athanasius Schneider” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll7ftfLOAd0
[80] T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. I-II, testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[81]Commissione Teologica Internazionale “L’interpretazione dei dogmi.” 1990 , www.vatican.va , http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_1989_interpretazione-dogmi_it.html; J. H. Newman “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine.” Longmans, Green, and Co. London New York, Bombay, and Calcutta 1909 Cap. 5, www.newmanreader.org, https://www.newmanreader.org/works/development/chapter5.html
[82] J. H. Newman “An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine.” Longmans, Green, and Co. London New York, Bombay, and Calcutta 1909 Cap. 5, www.newmanreader.org, https://www.newmanreader.org/works/development/chapter5.html
[83] T. Rotondo “Tradimento della sana dottrina attraverso “Amoris Laetitia”” vol. I-II, testo interamente leggibile e scaricabile a questo sito https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/
[84] Mons. H. Aguer ““Fiducia Supplicans” no debe ser obedecida – Mons. Héctor Aguer” 23.12.2023 centropieper.blogspot.com https://centropieper.blogspot.com/2023/12/fiducia-supplicans-no-debe-ser.html
[85]“«Questi non sai che casino ci combinano». Il retroscena di Forte sui lavori sinodali” Il Timone News 4 maggio 2016 http://www.iltimone.org/news-timone/questi-non-sai-che-casino-ci-combinano-il-retrosce/
[86] Come dissero anche i Cardinali al Papa nel Sinodo del 2015 https://www.iltimone.org/news-timone/parole-chiare-la-lettera-di-tredici-cardinali-al-p/
[87]Marco Tosatti, “Sinodo: come lo manovro…”, La Stampa, I blog di La Stampa, 21 settembre 2014
https://www.lastampa.it/blogs/2014/09/21/news/sinodo-come-lo-manovro-1.37276215 attualmente, 24.5.2021, l’articolo è scomparso dal sito ma si può trovare qui https://anticattocomunismo.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/sinodo-come-lo-manovro/
[88]E. Pentin “The Rigging of a Vatican Synod?”, Ignatius Press, 2015, cap. 5 September 2014
[89]E. Pentin “The Rigging of a Vatican Synod?”, Ignatius Press, 2015, cap. 5 September 2014
[90]Marco Tosatti, “Sinodo: come lo manovro…”, La Stampa, I blog di La Stampa, 21 settembre 2014
https://www.lastampa.it/blogs/2014/09/21/news/sinodo-come-lo-manovro-1.37276215 attualmente, 24.5.2021, l’articolo è scomparso dal sito ma si può trovare qui https://anticattocomunismo.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/sinodo-come-lo-manovro/
[91] Si veda soprattutto ciò che si afferma in questo scritto : Tullio Rotondo “Papa Francesco e i suoi collaboratori, attraverso errori o eresie, stanno causando molte Confessioni invalide e sacrileghe.” https://www.tradimentodellasanadottrina.it/papa-francesco-e-i-suoi-collaboratori-attraverso-errori-o-eresie-stanno-causando-molte-confessioni-invalide-e-sacrileghe/
[92]M. Hickson “Cardinal Müller: Some statements by Pope Francis could be understood as material heresy.” 7.11.2023 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-cardinal-muller-says-francis-has-uttered-material-heresy-but-is-still-the-pope/; traduzione italiana “ Card. Müller: Papa Francesco e la sua promozione dell’”eresia della prassi” 8.11.2023 www.sabinopaciolla.com https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-muller-papa-francesco-e-la-sua-promozione-delleresia-della-prassi/
[93]Paolo VI “Indulgentiarum doctrina” n. 2) https://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/it/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-vi_apc_01011967_indulgentiarum-doctrina.html
[94]“With admirable lucidity and a wealth of evidence and argument, this timely book collects the main published documents making the case that heresies designedly put about by Pope Francis are today a primary cause and manifestation of Christianity’s worst crisis ever.” Che possiamo tradurre così: con ammirevole lucidità e una ricchezza di prove e argomentazioni, questo libro tempestivo raccoglie i principali documenti pubblicati che dimostrano che le eresie progettate da Papa Francesco sono oggi una causa primaria e una manifestazione della peggiore crisi mai esistita del cristianesimo … siamo nella peggiore crisi mai esistita del cristianesimo! Recensione editoriale del libro realizzato a cura di John Lamont e Claudio Pierantoni intitolato “Defending the Faith Against Present Heresies”, Arouca Press, 2021 https://www.amazon.com/Defending-Faith-Against-Present-Heresies/dp/1989905412 http://aroucapress.com/defending-the-faith
[95] Idelfonso Schuster o.s.b., Gesù Cristo nella storia. Lezioni di storia ecclesiastica, Benedictina Editrice, Roma 1996, pp. 116-117.
[96]S. Paciolla, “Card. Müller: nessun Papa può proporre alla fede di tutta la Chiesa i suoi soggettivi punti di vista” Il Blog di www.sabinopaciolla.com, 30.10.2020 https://www.sabinopaciolla.com/card-Müller-nessun-papa-puo-proporre-alla-fede-di-tutta-la-chiesa-i-suoi-soggettivi-punti-di-vista/